We’ve got a mouse problem at our
house. This has been an on-and-off issue for the more than 20 years we have
lived at our home at the end of the street, which is bordered on the west side
by woods and the north side by a field of high grass, owned by a Tree Guy who
disposes his old timber there. A ha! You are thinking. There’s the problem! The
mice come from the woods, and from the old timber piles, and maybe from the
small crack between our garage door and our driveway, or maybe through the
holes in the pipes in the basement, etc. You may be right on one or all of
these counts. But, here’s the thing! Who cares? My issue now is disposing of
them. While I favor the “catch and release” plan, this humane approach concept is
not shared in my house. But! This post is not intended as a referendum on
rodent removal ethics.
Rather, this is about the
assignment of blame, and the need for reason and rationality in an oftentimes
irrational and random world. Random. We are so afraid to face this reality:
Life is full of myriad random events and activities. Some are linked. Some have
reasons for their actions. But so many times, the randomness stands alone as,
well, random. And we, as rational humans, cannot grasp that and refuse to come
to grips with that. We try to make sense of the senseless, all the time. This
is what drives the 24-7 news cycle, talking heads, bloviating Social Media
posts, and all the rest.
I think I’ve referenced before one
of my favorite books of all time, called “The Drunkard’s Walk: How Randomness
Rules Our Lives.” This is written by physicist Leonard Mlodinow. As a math/science guy, one of his functions is to provide order
and meaning to things through math and science. But, as he points out in his
book (which is far more complex than to be summarized here by a dimwitted track
coach in a simple blog post), sometimes math, science – and everything else –
fails to explain why things are.
No comments:
Post a Comment