Please forgive me for being a
few days behind in the 24/7 news cycle. The NCAA sanctions against Penn State
are pretty much old news at this point, but I thought the NCAA’s swift and
decisive stance in the case deserved a quick mention of praise. Was their
punishment perfect? I do not think such a perfect punishment exists in a case
like this.
However, I am somewhat surprised
at the sentiment -- at least among some student-athletes who I spoke with about
this that are here on campus this summer -- that the punishment was too harsh. What,
exactly, did you want the NCAA to do? They had to do something, right?
The reason the NCAA is justified in its harsh treatment in this case is because
of the lack of institutional
control at Penn State. Institutional control: That’s a big point in the world of the NCAA.
Do student-athletes and others, who
had no direct or indirect connection to the scandal, get punished for crimes or
cover-ups of which they were not a part? Of course they do! Collateral damage
is unavoidable in situations like this.
A lot of people were calling for
the “Death Penalty” for Penn State, shutting down the football program
indefinitely. That would have done even more collateral damage. Again, while
there was no perfect punishment in this case, I would submit that the NCAA did
an admirable job here. Of course, this is subject for debate, as is this: When
talking about the Death Penalty and the Penn State scandal, how about we
include in the discussion the possibility of the real death penalty for the
abhorrent monster sitting in jail for committing these atrocities? Something to
think about.